Conference “Future Capital 2026”

From early-start pension to false-start pension

The pension package has been passed. But the debate about retirement provision in Germany continues: instruments such as the early-start pension are being restricted because they are becoming too expensive.

From early-start pension to false-start pension

After weeks of wrangling, the black-red coalition has agreed on a pension package. However, the debate on retirement provision in Germany goes beyond the stop line and mothers' pensions. On the eve of the vote in the German parliament, Christian Lindner, former finance minister of the SPD-Green-FDP coalition, discussed the security of German pension provision with Cvetelina Todorova, head of department at the German Investment Funds Association (BVI), and Martin Stenger, sales director at the Franklin Templeton investment company, at a conference held by the US investment company in Frankfurt.

One controversial issue in state pension provision is the so-called early retirement pension. What started as a proposal by economic experts to promote financial education in Germany has been cut back for the time being due to tight budgets. According to the coalition agreement, all 6- to 18-year-olds are to receive the subsidy: ten euros per month into an individual private stock portfolio. However, this project would have cost a good 1 billion euros per year for all age groups. As the public coffers are empty, the coalition has decided to introduce the subsidy gradually. This means that next year, the subsidy will initially only be paid to 6-year-olds, with other age groups following later.

Criticism of the implementation

The idea of introducing young people to private pension provision is generally welcomed by financial market players, but the concrete implementation by politicians is often criticized. Todorova from the BVI warns: „It could be a false start for pensions,“ because she is not sure whether the subsidy in this form will make any difference at all. Specifically, she criticizes the fact that the proposal currently provides for the state to offer a default solution for those whose parents do not choose an individual savings fund. That is not how financial education works.

Christian Lindner simply does not think the proposal goes far enough: „If you are serious about it, you should start at zero years and offer an attractive connection from the age of 18, because the years between 18 and 66 are important.“ He also warns that „Germans are saving themselves into poverty because the majority of their retirement provisions are in their checking accounts.“ Only the key points of the early retirement pension will be decided this year before they are incorporated into a draft law.

Sweden as a role model

Lindner emphasizes that the loss of growth in Germany is a gradual process. He looks to Sweden and warns: „We should have started 25 years ago. In any case, we should not wait any longer.“ A funded pension was introduced in the Scandinavian country 25 years ago, which today ensures a better pension level. The former finance minister criticizes that the German distribution system disregards the compound interest effect and therefore does not generate any returns.

The German pension system is based on a three-pillar model: statutory pension insurance, which is financed by contributions from employees and employers; occupational pension schemes, which often consist of a mixture of deferred gross salary and a contribution from the employer; and private pension provision in the form of private pension or life insurance policies or investments in real estate or shares.

Lindner sees capital-forming instruments as an opportunity to offset losses in the distribution system through the third, private pillar. He also describes a return that depends on the capital market as the „key to greater economic friendliness in Germany.“